04/07/2022 / By News Editors
Although it has been reported on by Igor Chudov a few days ago, I would like to add a bit more beef to this uncorroborated (so far) information, as it is the news no one wants to believe, but it deserves further investigation for the reasons outlined below.
(Article by Andreas Oehler republished from Live2FightAnotherDay.Substack.com)
The original Moderna insider tip from Dec. 2020, from two anonymous engineers working there, goes like this:
an industrial engineer at Moderna
and the other one of us is
a process development engineer
. I'm sure the same thing is happening with Pfizer-BioNTech. It was hard to put things together based on the small quantities of additions happening in manual step (highly unorthodox for a continuous process production). The explanation we got was highly sensitive trade secret adjuvants being added. Digging in deeper showed how sensitive it actually was.
Most people's understanding of this novel vaccine type is that it works as follows:
Make mRNA coding for S protein
Make lipid nanoparticle delivery system
How it actually works from what we've uncovered:
Make mRNA coding for S protein
Make mRNA coding for mutant versions of CYP19A1 and CDKN1B in smaller amounts
Make sure that while delivery system for (1) mostly ends up in liver, most of (2) ends up in the gonads
Make sure form and quantity of additive upregulating LINE-1 reverse transcription activity makes it hard to detect among legit adjuvants
Effects from (2) integrated by (4) are recessive; mildly oncogenic effects in vaccine recipients unlikely to be noticed for many years
(5) recessive but since most of population vaccinated, in next generation female offspring have premature ovarian failure
The beef of this tip is that, in addition to the mRNA code for S spike, the vaccine vials will contain additional mRNA that codes both for a mutant version of CYP19A1 and a mutant version of CDKN1B. Both these mutant proteins are implicated in the female infertility issues. From the advantage of hindsight in March 2022, this information is credible for the following reasons:
precisely integrate large DNA fragments into genomes, allowing for new editing techniques beyond the currently available technology. ”
(5) “Metagenomi Presents New Findings on CRISPR-associated Transposases (CAST) that Allow for Targetable Genomic Integration of Large DNA Fragments“ (Metagenomi.co, 2021.05.14): “Our research presented at ASGCT describes how our first-in-class programmable CAST gene editing system can be used to precisely integrate large fragments of DNA into target genomes and the potential of these systems in the development of both ex vivo and in vivo gene therapies. CRISPR-associated transposases can be reprogrammed to integrate at specific genomic sites using guide RNAs.” Target genomes, eh? Transhumans, anyone? A.k.a. mutants?
Another solid confirmation that the tipsters knew what they were talking about way before this information went public.
“To increase the likelihood of detecting rare integration events, we transfected HEK293T cells with
prior to infection with SARS-CoV-2“]. That was a key criticism of the study in that it wasn’t a real world case. This is in stark contrast to the vaxx study where LINE-1 increased solely due to the vaxx itself. Wasn’t that the role of one of the “
highly sensitive trade secret adjuvants being added“, as hinted by the tipster?
So, lots of indirect evidence that the Moderna insiders are trustworthy and that their whistle blowing deserves all the attention it can garner. In the form of vial analysis and vaccinee testing, for starters.
In the meantime, this post should serve as a fair warning and one of the elements on which to base your informed decision as to whether to accept any vaccine in 2022 and going onward. Or any injection, for that matter, from your caring health authorities and governments.
Read more at: Live2FightAnotherDay.Substack.com
Big Pharma, biotechnology, conspiracy, COVID, CRISPR, female infertility, gene editing, genetic lunacy, Moderna, mRNA, Pfizer, pharmaceutical fraud, science deception, vaccine damage, vaccine injury, vaccines, WHO
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Vaccines.News is a fact-based public education website published by Vaccines News Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2018 by Vaccines News Features, LLC.
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.