06/23/2025 / By S.D. Wells
Why on earth would a nine-year-old girl need to get a dirty, deadly vaccine to prevent a sexually transmitted disease? Isn’t that dirty in and of itself? What’s next, toxic condoms for kids? Has the world gone completely insane, or is it all about causing infertility in girls as part of the big depopulation scheme that Bill Gates always talks about? You know, how if we do a really “great job” with vaccines and abortions we can reduce the world’s population by a few billion? Remember?
Now let’s talk about the dirty, nasty, perverse injections for little girls that spread cancer, wreck the baby-making organs, ruin menstrual cycles, and cause all kinds of other horrific health outcomes, per the research. Follow the science, right Fauci?
A groundbreaking study from the University of Maryland has raised serious concerns about the safety of the HPV vaccine, revealing significant increases in autonomic dysfunction and menstrual irregularities among young women who received the shot. Published in Drugs – Real World Outcomes, the research analyzed insurance claims from nearly 80,000 girls and women aged 9–26, finding elevated risks that critics argue were previously downplayed. The findings add fuel to an already heated debate over the necessity and safety of Gardasil and Cervarix—vaccines marketed to prevent HPV-related cancers but linked to thousands of adverse reactions, including fatalities.
Using a self-controlled case series design—a method that reduces bias by comparing individuals to their own pre-vaccination health—researchers identified:
Adjusted risk increases were striking:
Lead researcher Dr. Linda Wastila stated the risks are “not insubstantial,” emphasizing that these conditions can severely impair quality of life.
Autonomic dysfunction can leave young women battling symptoms like:
Meanwhile, menstrual irregularities reported in the study included:
Critics argue these findings align with longstanding concerns about HPV vaccines’ neurotoxic ingredients, including aluminum and synthetic emulsifiers, which some studies suggest may disrupt nervous and endocrine systems.
The HPV vaccine debate isn’t new. Since Gardasil’s 2006 approval, reports of adverse events—including 89 deaths and 20,915 reactions logged in U.S. databases by 2010—have fueled skepticism. Merck, Gardasil’s manufacturer, faces lawsuits alleging it concealed risks.
Notably, most HPV infections resolve naturally without causing cancer, and the vaccine’s protection wanes after several years. Critics, like Dr. Joseph Mercola, argue the shot’s benefits are overstated: “Evidence suggests it increases precancerous lesions by nearly 45% in some cases.”
The University of Maryland study underscores the need for rigorous, independent safety reviews of HPV vaccines—particularly for adolescents. While public health agencies maintain that benefits outweigh risks, the research calls for greater transparency and informed consent. For families weighing vaccination, the study serves as a stark reminder: medical interventions must be scrutinized, not just marketed.
As Dr. Wastila’s team concluded, these risks demand “further investigation” to protect young women’s health. Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on dirty jabs nobody needs that lead to turbo cancer, infertility and Long-Vax-Syndrome.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
cancer jab, Censored Science, dirty jab, dirty vaccines, HPV, hpv adverse, hpv death, medical violence, menstrual, science deception, vaccine wars, vaccines, women's health
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Vaccines.News is a fact-based public education website published by Vaccines News Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2018 by Vaccines News Features, LLC.
Contact Us with Tips or Corrections
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.